According to this article rescued victims are at risk for re-exploitation.
The article says “a recent in-depth academic study by researchers at the University of Texas, Austin and North Carolina A & T State University, looked at women in Texas who had been trafficked from other countries. It showed that victims need targeted, long-lasting and culturally sensitive services to help them rebuild their lives.”
So as we make progress fighting traffickers are we making the same progress to give long term help to rescued victims?
I think Seattle is doing pretty well in this area, what are your thoughts?
By Jared Stewart
There are some interesting points in that clause but I dont know if I see all of them eye to centre . There is some validness but I will take hold legal opinion until I look into it further. Good clause, thanks and we want more! Added to FeedBurner besides.
Hats off to whvoeer wrote this up and posted it.
i find it interesting that it is immigrants (in these cases, ambassadors) abusing other immigrants… at least in that article… i fear that over immigration of the U.S. is one of it’s downfalls… while i love the idea of keeping the U.S. open to the world, i also see the importance of limiting access, unfortunately, as the immigrants often bring in “values” that do not mesh with the individual rights & values most of the natural born citizens hold dear in the U.S.